- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 13:07:55 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 4/9/22 9:42 AM, Daniel Hardman wrote: > I read this article and thought it raised interesting questions. Perhaps > those who've been doing W3C stuff the deepest and longest can opine a bit? For those of you on the W3C Advisory Committee (462 people total), you've already seen that the article has stirred up a hornets nest. :) A couple of things to note: 1) The original article contained at least 13 factual errors. Reader beware. :( 2) The W3C Advisory Board came to talk with CCG about the W3C Legal Entity in February. If you want a more accurate source of information, that CCG meeting was transcribed[1]. 3) There is a podcast that accompanies the article that is more nuanced in its message -- the article feels kinda click-bait-ey (and its working!). CCGs work on VCs and DIDs are directly called out at 16:10 minutes into the podcast[2]. :) 4) The proposals for W3C Legal Entity are public, on Github... including the different governance models being contemplated[3]. Fundamentally, the article saying "there is no actual solution in sight" feels a bit disingenuous. There are multiple subcommittees, weekly meetings, their working documents[4] are available to all W3C Members, and the governance models being contemplated are public[3]. The *W3C Member elected* W3C Advisory Board are actively working the problem... and they're good people, some of whom I've known for years and trust, that care deeply about the future of the Web and W3C. I know it sounds cliche to say you believe all the critical problems will be solved because you believe in the people involved, but there it is -- the summary of how I think W3C will survive this. As for changes to the way W3C creates standards[5] -- I expect very little to change; those processes have been refined over the course of 25+ years... they're not about to be thrown out or massively rewritten. They go through regular refinement with public input[6]. Is that the sort of opining you were hoping for, Daniel? -- manu [1]https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2022-02-08/ [2]https://www.adexchanger.com/podcast/the-big-story/the-big-story-who-will-run-the-w3c/#more-192770 [3]https://github.com/w3c/le-governance/ [4]https://www.w3.org/Member/wiki/Governance-tf [5]https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/ [6]https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/ -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Saturday, 9 April 2022 17:08:12 UTC