- From: Ryan Grant <w3c@rgrant.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:26:27 +0000
- To: W3C-CCG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Hi CCG, There has recently been some work to reply to the DID spec formal objections. I've noticed that we're not really replying to the objections in a coordinated way, or even directly addressing their points. I have seen most of the ideas that I think are good responses flow through the September 2nd email thread under the subject, "Mozilla Formally Objects to DID Core". I think it would be possible to collect the best ideas, and edit them into a coherent response. I think it makes sense to bring this up in the DID WG. I've filed an issue ( https://github.com/w3c/did-wg/issues/50 ). My question to this group is: historically, how do these things go? Do responses change outcomes? Does it work to collect responses into a document? Do people in the W3C sit down and read all the emails in the mailing list?
Received on Monday, 13 September 2021 23:27:17 UTC