historical background regarding success of responses to formal objections from Ryan Grant on 2021-09-13 (public-credentials@w3.org from September 2021)

From: Ryan Grant <w3c@rgrant.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 23:26:27 +0000
To: W3C-CCG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfqYdR3pG2D6z0-H_Y34HjnnQfgKJwOzW6YTd6nnw0e_UQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi CCG,

There has recently been some work to reply to the DID spec formal
objections.  I've noticed that we're not really replying to the
objections in a coordinated way, or even directly addressing their
points.

I have seen most of the ideas that I think are good responses flow
through the September 2nd email thread under the subject, "Mozilla
Formally Objects to DID Core".  I think it would be possible to
collect the best ideas, and edit them into a coherent response.

I think it makes sense to bring this up in the DID WG.  I've filed an
issue ( https://github.com/w3c/did-wg/issues/50 ).

My question to this group is: historically, how do these things go?
Do responses change outcomes?  Does it work to collect responses into
a document?  Do people in the W3C sit down and read all the emails in
the mailing list?

Received on Monday, 13 September 2021 23:27:17 UTC