W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > September 2021

RE: the link between biometrics and PII needs careful management

From: Joosten, H.J.M. (Rieks) <rieks.joosten@tno.nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:51:42 +0000
To: "daniel.hardman@gmail.com" <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>, "public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <a37f97a6cda742898e8e08af55996f98@tno.nl>
I think the issue is a bit more profound than distributing sets of PII (which include biometrics) and linking them. Back in 1940-1945 (WW II), there were not biometrics. A high-quality (paper) citizens register was all took for the Germans to round up Dutch citizens of Jewish origin and deport them.

From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
Sent: woensdag 1 september 2021 09:02
To: public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org) <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: the link between biometrics and PII needs careful management

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/08/30/1033941/afghanistan-biometric-databases-us-military-40-data-points/


My takeaway: Instead of putting PII and biometrics in the same database, we need to put them in different places, but prove that there's a link between the holder of a biometric cred and the holder of other PII. I see companies like iRespond doing this, but I also seem some biometric applications that are more troubling.
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2021 12:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 1 September 2021 12:52:04 UTC