- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:07:06 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 10/13/21 11:34 AM, Drummond Reed wrote: > We don’t want to have web sites that have a list of tens of “Log in with…” > buttons. > > On that point, the whole idea of DIDs is that if a site uses a DID > resolver, a single "Log in with..." button can service all DIDs that use > DID methods supported by that resolver. ... and to further underscore that point, there are already protocols that have existed for years that actively combat the "Login with SuperProviderX" anti-pattern on the Web. Participants in this community have demonstrated interop using one of them called CHAPI[1] (animations demonstrating it in action): https://github.com/digitalbazaar/credential-handler-polyfill#features You will note the complete replacement of "Login with SuperProviderX" buttons with a single button that invoke "Digital Wallets" (really, just a software application) that an individual gets to choose... just like we get to choose the email clients we use (*gasp* I know, what a concept). There are other solutions in the works as well -- VC API, WACI/PeX, OIDC extensions, etc. All of them are expected to let you show up with whatever "Digital Wallet" and DID Method you want to, as long as the site supports it. So, I think we have at least part of your concern covered, Nikos. There still remain open questions on "What DID Methods will become popular?", but hopefully that's a more even playing field than "Choose among the largest companies on the planet". -- manu [1]https://w3c-ccg.github.io/credential-handler-api/ -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2021 16:07:23 UTC