W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > October 2021

Re: W3C Formal Objections: When Powerful Corporations Play Both Sides

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:46:29 -0400
To: public-credentials@w3.org
Message-ID: <38f39ca5-2e7c-79fe-da08-e3937c3241cd@digitalbazaar.com>
On 10/12/21 12:25 PM, Siegman, Tzviya wrote:
> I am concerned with Manu's representation of the FO Council in his
> document. It is very much a work in progress.

Apologies if I have misrepresented anything, that's certainly not my intent,
and I'm spending a good chunk of this week updating the FAQ[1] to reflect
things we're learning along the way from the W3C AC and AB.

For example, I have learned that the Formal Objection Council document that
the DID WG was using to consider their options:


...was the wrong document (even though it doesn't say it's out of date or
direct you to the new document). It turns out this is the latest document on
the W3C Formal Objection Council:


... but it's experimental, with active discussion happening here:


... if there is ever a concern of misrepresentation, please point out exactly
where so I can fix it. The FAQ is a Github repo; PRs welcome:


-- manu


Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2021 17:46:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:23 UTC