- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:46:29 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 10/12/21 12:25 PM, Siegman, Tzviya wrote: > I am concerned with Manu's representation of the FO Council in his > document. It is very much a work in progress. Apologies if I have misrepresented anything, that's certainly not my intent, and I'm spending a good chunk of this week updating the FAQ[1] to reflect things we're learning along the way from the W3C AC and AB. For example, I have learned that the Formal Objection Council document that the DID WG was using to consider their options: https://www.w3.org/2021/05/W3C_Council_Guide.html ...was the wrong document (even though it doesn't say it's out of date or direct you to the new document). It turns out this is the latest document on the W3C Formal Objection Council: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/director-free/#addressing-fo ... but it's experimental, with active discussion happening here: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/278 ... if there is ever a concern of misrepresentation, please point out exactly where so I can fix it. The FAQ is a Github repo; PRs welcome: https://github.com/msporny/did-core-formal-objections/blob/gh-pages/index.md -- manu [1]https://msporny.github.io/did-core-formal-objections/ -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2021 17:46:45 UTC