- From: Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:19:18 -0500
- To: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Cc: Marty Reed <Marty.Reed@randasolutions.com>
- Message-ID: <CANnQ-L4X8YyjA8oYtG4qVNqEhusQQSTo+_Lj55TNG3OgiXb=LA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Marty, For what it's worth, I think that nesting VCs in each other is often a red flag. In most cases (including the educational / transcript ones), you'd be better off linking to other VCs, instead of embedding. Or using a Verifiable Presentation to bundle. On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:54 PM Marty Reed <Marty.Reed@randasolutions.com> wrote: > I did not see it specifically noted in the document, however I have > further reviewed and it is in the implementation guide for 1.0 not in the > spec itself. > > Forgive my lack of experience with standards development here: > > Is the implementation guide only developed after approval of the spec? > > Would it be prudent to acknowledge in the spec nesting is supported? > > Nesting VCs has been a hot topic in the IMS Global OB/CLR Conceptual > modeling discussion for 3.0/2.0 respectively. > > Marty > > > > Marty Reed | Chief Executive Officer > RANDA Solutions | 2555 Meridian Blvd | Suite 300 | Franklin, TN 37067 > office 615 467 6387 | direct 615 915 5446 | fax 615 613 0517 > > > Confidentiality Disclaimer: This email and any attached files are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed. If you are not the person or entity to whom this is > addressed, or the person responsible for delivery of this email to the > intended recipient, you have received this email in error. Any use, > dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing or copying of this email > including attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in > error, immediately delete it from your system without copying and notify > the sender so that our records can be corrected. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 2:35 PM > To: public-credentials@w3.org > Subject: Re: Verifiable Credentials v1.1 released for public review > > On 11/9/21 2:03 PM, Marty Reed wrote: > > Will the v1.1 spec no longer support nesting VCs as in the 1.0 spec? > > v1.1 is fully backwards compatible with v1.0. If someone thinks that it > isn't, please let us know. > > Nesting VCs is fully supported when using the `proof` property (via Linked > Data Integrity). > > Nesting VCs is not supported when using JWTs (but that has always been the > case). > > Again, what was possible with v1.0 is still possible w/ v1.1. Is there > something that led you to believe that this has changed, Marty? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021) > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2021 22:19:49 UTC