RE: EU Health sertificates

The problem Adrian describes is the same problem with the proposed structure of the current VCI Smarthealth.cards model too, which has support from the largest Health IT vendors…

Best regards,
Jim
_______________
[cid:image001.png@01D7431B.E1FC3820]
Jim St.Clair
Chief Trust Officer
jim.stclair@lumedic.io<mailto:jim.stclair@lumedic.io> | 228-273-4893
Let’s meet to discuss patient identity exchange: https://calendly.com/jim-stclair-1


From: Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io>
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:23 AM
To: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
Cc: Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: EU Health sertificates

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Interesting, thanks for sharing!

If anyone else has some thoughts on this I would love to hear them!
ᐧ

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:07 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com<mailto:agropper@healthurl.com>> wrote:
It's the same issue you have if you show your drivers license to 10 bars. Can you be sure the verifier isn't taking and storing photos with a surveillance camera (they almost always are)? There's no need for the verifier in #1 to call "home" or store anything if all they want to check is the authenticity of the credential but managing ambient surveillance is a completely different issue unrelated to the purpose of the VC.

See https://github.com/w3c/did-use-cases/pull/140 for a threads on Ambient Surveillance.

- Adrian

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:11 AM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io<mailto:snorre@diwala.io>> wrote:
No, #1 is also what I have suggested, but I just need to make sure my arguments are sound 😅
But it still does not avoid correlatebility on ID, if that even is a problem? Meaning I use my paper cert at 10 places, and I can be pinned to 10 places. Is that a privacy/correlatebility/tracking issue?
ᐧ
ᐧ

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 4:40 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com<mailto:agropper@healthurl.com>> wrote:
Hi Snorre,

There are many tech enhancements that can be applied in any of the 10 concerns. My goal was not perfection but rather a framing for how to talk about the 10 concerns as separately as possible.

For example, is there any major reason not to do #1?

- Adrian

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:20 AM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io<mailto:snorre@diwala.io>> wrote:
Has there been any thoughts of flows for how this could work? Like this one?

A solution without pairings, where one can give a range-proof for date.
online registration with FHI(Norwegian trusted authority):
1. commit to ID, validity period, and status "protected"
2. ZK proof of known opening
3. FHI signs commitment
4. build this into QR
5. print certificate
offline verification by player:
1. scan QR
2. check signature
3. check ZK proof
4. check ID
5. approve / reject
ᐧ

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 1:13 PM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io<mailto:snorre@diwala.io>> wrote:
Thanks Adrian!

In terms of this:
"4. Privacy
Patients can be vaccinated anonymously while still producing authentic credentials as described in #1-3 above. However, being able to track patients across time provides valuable additional information. This includes the emergence of variants, vaccine efficacy in various contexts, side-effects, and long-term health impact.  Technology for tracking people across time while preserving privacy is already deployed to assist with contact tracing. The de-identified individuals can only be tracked with their informed authorization. Privacy-by-default tracking as a feature of digital credentials is practical given planning and coordination."

How do you keep privacy when you start discussing ID correlation over time? If you use this piece of paper that is not possible to switch out easily, or can be with a printing tool online. But is there any thought gone into that?
ᐧ

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 1:05 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com<mailto:agropper@healthurl.com>> wrote:
https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2021/05/05/design-considerations-vaccine-credentials/


- Adrian

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:59 AM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io<mailto:snorre@diwala.io>> wrote:
Just wanted to follow up on this. What are peoples thoughts on this QR representation and that it is not using VC or did relate technology.
But it is using CBOR and other technology mentioned in this list before
ᐧ

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:38 AM Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io<mailto:snorre@diwala.io>> wrote:
Hi! I wonder if anyone on this list has been involved in the work of this: https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-spec


I just cannot see any reference to what this group work so hard at achieving. Or have they only taken inspiration and basically just use different terminology for what might be similar?

--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>
ᐧ


--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>


--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>


--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>


--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>


--
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>