W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2021

Re: PROPOSALs for VC HTTP API call on 2021-06-22

From: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:47:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CANYRo8gU7KtP1kGHGU3+bAAnw9umqcwhq+eGsJsOATjNoLhfFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info>
Cc: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
You've lost me.

Why has a discussion of authorization to access a VC come around to the
issue of holder vs. subject?

Is it because VCs are intended to be accessed _only_ by the subject?

- Adrian

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:47 AM David Chadwick <
d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info> wrote:

>
> On 25/06/2021 16:14, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote:
>
> In other words -- it's complicated.
>
> I can drink to that.
>
> And its made more complicated due to the fact that there are no
> standardised way of transferring VCs, of requesting VCs, of proving
> possession of VCs, of selectively disclosing properties of VCs, of...<add
> your own here>
>
> Kind regards
>
> David
>
Received on Friday, 25 June 2021 16:47:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 June 2021 16:47:51 UTC