You've lost me. Why has a discussion of authorization to access a VC come around to the issue of holder vs. subject? Is it because VCs are intended to be accessed _only_ by the subject? - Adrian On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:47 AM David Chadwick < d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info> wrote: > > On 25/06/2021 16:14, Ted Thibodeau Jr wrote: > > In other words -- it's complicated. > > I can drink to that. > > And its made more complicated due to the fact that there are no > standardised way of transferring VCs, of requesting VCs, of proving > possession of VCs, of selectively disclosing properties of VCs, of...<add > your own here> > > Kind regards > > David >
Received on Friday, 25 June 2021 16:47:48 UTC