SecureKey and Mattr both have conformant implementations that were most or all of the way to conformance *before* their SVIP contract was awarded or even applied for; like Mike's company, they work at scale and have been working in good faith to reconcile the API-to-API architectures of today's software landscape with self-determination and direct control of data flow by end-consumers. Spruce, which has never been awarded a contract with SVIP or BC Gov, has an open-source implementation that conforms to the VC-HTTP-API and passes the test suite; I believe Dock.io is also in the latter category, or at least was at the first plug-a-thon. There are probably other companies in the same boat, regardless of whether or not they've PR'd test results into the public repo for all to see. Thanks, __juan On 6/10/2021 5:54 PM, Mike Prorock wrote: > > It's my impression that all of the 8 implementations were built on the > basis of DHS as the sole issuer and customer. In some cases, BC Gov > was another issuer / customer beyond the control of the subjects. > > We are issuing VCs for use and verification by other customers outside > the DHS space fyi, primarily in use for record keeping of chemical > applications in agricultural settings, as well as to enable our > customers to record verifiable field sample and observation data, and > provide chain of custody on biological samples. These use cases > predate any of our work with DHS, and in all cases, all transport is > done over TLS with OAuth 2. > > Michael Prorock > CTO, Founder > mesur.io <http://mesur.io> > > > It's my impression that all of the 8 implementations were built on > the basis of DHS as the sole issuer and customer. In some cases, > BC Gov was another issuer / customer beyond the control of the > subjects. >Received on Thursday, 10 June 2021 17:29:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 10 June 2021 17:30:47 UTC