- From: Kyle Den Hartog <kyle.denhartog@mattr.global>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:53:26 +1200
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2021 04:54:51 UTC
It does matter for resolution, but I'm not sure if it was intentional. Ideally, the folks working on multiformat would be defining how to represent this as a part of their multikey work they've laid out and did:key method would pick that up off the shelf. Unfortunately, that work appears like it's stalled so far and so the examples become the next best thing for knowing how other people are likely implementing things. -Kyle On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:09 PM Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm curious. > > In the did:key method spec, p-256, p-381, and p512 appear to be > uncompressed. Does this matter or was this intentional? > > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-method-key/#p-256 > > -Brent Shambaugh > > GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh > > -- This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2021 04:54:51 UTC