- From: Nikos Fotiou <fotiou@aueb.gr>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 17:18:06 +0300
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <62EBC88E-3E0E-47E1-B673-BCFD5C25440B@aueb.gr>
Hi, The VC includes a list of "IoT devices" that a "user" can access. The subject is the "user" and each "user" can be authenticated by a public key. We do not want the VC to be used as a bearer token. Best, Nikos -- Nikos Fotiou - http://pages.cs.aueb.gr/~fotiou Researcher - Mobile Multimedia Laboratory Athens University of Economics and Business https://mm.aueb.gr > On 1 Apr 2021, at 4:57 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 4/1/21 7:56 AM, Nikos Fotiou wrote: >> I find the latter approach "cleaner" but I am not sure if it is correct. >> Any opinion? > > Could you elaborate more on the use case, Nikos? > > What are you trying to express with the VC? That might help us answer your > question with more specific guidance. > > Note that a DID Document is one example of a data structure that does what > you're trying to do. > > Have you considered the type of relationship between the subject and the > public key? Or is the VC subject the public key? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 14:18:22 UTC