Re: DID representations to abstraction thoughts

Yes, this seems to be accurate. The toys are here:
https://github.com/CategoricalData/

OWL, RDF and SQL are popping out, so I have reason to be happy.

-Brent Shambaugh

GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh
Website: http://bshambaugh.org/
LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-shambaugh-9b91259
Skype: brent.shambaugh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Brent_Shambaugh
WebID: http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me


On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:10 PM Nick Darvey <nick@brink.works> wrote:

>
> There's a series of videos I remember that delves into schemas as directed
> multi-graphs.  May be of interest to you? (If you haven't seen them
> already.) I'm guessing it's the same group of people...
>
> https://youtu.be/wJIpI0Fj6Hg
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2020 7:19:42 AM
> *To:* Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* DID representations to abstraction thoughts
>
> Concerning thoughts about did+cbor, did+ld+json, did+json , ... ==> did
> document representations
>
> If I designed the system I'd look into Ryan's work:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1OWa-lTHbg (Computational Schemas)
> In fact I am.
>
> -Brent Shambaugh
>
> GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh
> Website: http://bshambaugh.org/
> LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-shambaugh-9b91259
> Skype: brent.shambaugh
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/Brent_Shambaugh
> WebID: http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me
>