- From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 10:56:48 -0800
- To: Maarten Boender <mboender@sphereon.com>
- Cc: Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmmOzccN64zEqv9JD7hHau0pm=vr0Q+m2QTmEg7KtanZA+OyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Kostas (and all), The instructions for proposing a CCG work item are here: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/propose_work_item.html If you're able to attend the VC-EDU meeting tomorrow, we can discuss possible scope, etc. Note that the US had its daylight savings shift, so tomorrow's meeting is 4pm GMT, 5pm CET. (As least we'll have a few months of stability...) https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20201102T160000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_et&p3=tz_gmt&p4=tz_cet Thanks, Kim On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 2:17 PM Maarten Boender <mboender@sphereon.com> wrote: > Kostas, Leonard, & group, > > > > We’re happy and motivated to help. > > > > We have a background in document processing and working with PDFs. We > already have services/APIs that are already converting, stamping and > signing PDFs. > > > > And we’re building tech around DIDs, VCs, etc., for products and projects, > also in Education. This will be a good extension to have. > > > > Best Regards, > > Maarten Boender | Sphereon.com > > [image: signature_2086378322] > > > > *From: *Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 16:31 > *To: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Cc: *Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: using PDFs as a VC container... > *Resent from: *<public-credentials@w3.org> > *Resent date: *Wednesday, 21 October 2020 at 16:30 > > > > > > Thank you for the paper. That might allow anchoring PDF signed documents > as well. I will look into it in more detail ! > > > > Wrt "a standard approach for where/how to embed the VCs in the PDFs".. is > there something initiated on that already? What would the next step be? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:03 PM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Thanks – that helps! > > > > The iText library that you are using is fully capable of manipulating XMP > and doing embedding and other techniques that I showed in my presentation. > I haven’t looked at the state of Python PDF libraries in a while so I don’t > know offhand which (if any) are XMP capable – though given that it has been > part of PDF for almost 20 years and is now mandated for PDF 2.0 – I would > hope they do! > > > > The approach you are using for hashing & verifying (with the post-hash > addition and then removal) won’t work long term. It happens to work with > the tools that you are using – but it’s actually not a guarantee from a > file format perspective. The standard approach for embedding a signature > into the thing you are signing (not just PDF but other formats) is a two > pass approach involving the use of a “hole” in the file. This is how PDF > signatures have worked for 20+ years now. Here is a good paper about it - > https://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/etk_deprecated/tools/DigSig/Acrobat_DigitalSignatures_in_PDF.pdf > > > > And yes, I agree that we need to come up with a standard approach for > where/how to embed the VCs in the PDFs, how the signing & verification > process works, etc. Looking forward to it. > > > > Leonard > > > > *From: *Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 3:26 AM > *To: *Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Cc: *Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: using PDFs as a VC container... > > > > Hi Leonard and thank you for the comments! > > > > Please see inline. > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:13 PM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Very interesting, Kostas! Thanks for sharing. > > > > I went to the repos below to see what you’ve done. I peeked inside the > PDFs and saw how you are storing data – while it works, it is definitely > not a good approach. > > > > This is something that we would like to investigate further. Ideally, it > would be improved as part of the VC-compatibility update that we want. > > > > Your knowledge would be very helpful on this. What approach would you > recommend? > > > > And any python and JS libraries that can help insert/remove the metadata > with the recommend approach? > > > > What I didn’t see though is the actual source code for the hashing and > embedding – because I am curious about the order of operations of those two > operations since you couldn’t modify after hashing – yet that is what I see > happening… > > > > > > Check > https://github.com/verifiable-pdfs/blockchain-certificates/blob/5159a38d320280ab46092ab56450028435aaf6cb/blockchain_certificates/issue_certificates.py#L78 > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fverifiable-pdfs%2Fblockchain-certificates%2Fblob%2F5159a38d320280ab46092ab56450028435aaf6cb%2Fblockchain_certificates%2Fissue_certificates.py%23L78&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093934005%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QMluLJxeGvd0GYcNN4EUAg4cVLR%2FxalLm7G9rhvKsCM%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The documents are hashed and then their merkle root is constructed. The > proof is inserted into the PDF at the end. During validation the proof is > removed first, and then the document is hashed again to get the original > hash that was anchored into the blockchain. > > > > We had thought of several alternative approaches but this seemed to be the > best one. > > > > I see a lot of common ground. If it is of interest to you I would be happy > to discuss further or even collaborate on this if it makes sense. > > > > Thanks again for the feedback! > > Kostas > > > > > > Thanks, > > Leonard > > > > *From: *Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:42 AM > *To: *Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject: *using PDFs as a VC container... > *Resent-From: *<public-credentials@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:40 AM > > > > > > Hi all! > > I would like to introduce the work that I have been involved with. I have > been following the list/group for a while now and want to try to find the > time to be more active ... that, plus Leonard's presentation was a great > opportunity/introduction :-) > > > TL;DR: > We have been using PDFs as a credentials' container and anchoring the > document hashes on the blockchain. A blockchain proof (chainpointv2) is > added in the PDF metadata which results in self-contained and > self-verifiable PDF documents; the PDF is the only thing needed to view the > credential and validate the credential*. There are open source validators > that are trivial to use and/or host. > > > > The longer version: > The University of Nicosia has been anchoring/issuing credentials (PDFs) > for some of their courses on the Bitcoin blockchain since 2014. Back then > the process was more manual/adhoc. In 2016 the solution was re-designed to > (more or less) what we have today: > > > > - several PDFs are hashed and merklized, merkle root is anchored in the > blockchain (bitcoin is used but it is blockchain agnostic) > > - merkle proofs, txid, etc. are stored in the respective PDF's metadata > (using json format) > > - PDFs can be disseminated/stored as they always were > > > > Several companies already use PDFs so our solution fits into their > workflows seamlessly. They had PDFs, they are anchored, and they still have > PDFs**. > > > > A meta-protocol was designed to encode the data stored in the blockchain > in a way that allows on-chain issuing/validation and revocation of the > credentials. The process is described in detail in: > https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8525400 > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F8525400&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093944000%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vh7Whif%2B5RCZq5AvEs5dmI68V2kFi8l%2F3M7ztZEBkOU%3D&reserved=0> > > (I can share if requested... not sure if the above is accessible to all) > > > > An open source implementation (with tools) can be found at: > https://github.com/verifiable-pdfs/blockchain-certificates > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fverifiable-pdfs%2Fblockchain-certificates&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093944000%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=CWWrkf%2FMyjbsWgyg2bjs%2Bc9EzPZ7CuGfYbh0IcRukLk%3D&reserved=0> > > Validators at: https://github.com/verifiable-pdfs/validator-widget > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fverifiable-pdfs%2Fvalidator-widget&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093953999%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hjPFeYBqaCj1UNpho%2B0WZxNrH3XfC%2FtVAlBPhtzuCrQ%3D&reserved=0> > and https://github.com/verifiable-pdfs/blockchain-certificates-validation > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fverifiable-pdfs%2Fblockchain-certificates-validation&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093953999%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Cqq10SygqaGtlbk0kneOXujNmlc0eCZBWE2ZLcbB%2FXE%3D&reserved=0> > > > > From 2017 all of the credentials and diplomas issued by the University are > issued using this platform. From 2019 the solution was commercialized > (Block.co) to make it easier for potential clients (abstracting blockchain > infrastructure, etc.). Several more clients/use cases came up rather than > only educational credentials. > > > > We have looked into this in the past but it was frozen. Now we are again > in the process of preparing/designing for VC-compatibility. We already use > json format so using the VC format would be straight-forward in itself. > > > > However, I seem to be missing some parts, like how to formally define > revocation mechanisms or how to formally include the blockchain proof. Is > there a place where we can define our issuing / revocation mechanism so it > can be reused/interoperable? > > > > Also it would be of great interest to see how we can properly use XMP that > Leonard mentioned in a more standardized way in our solution. > > > > I would be happy to discuss further with anyone interested and thank you > all for your time reading this. > > > > Regards, > > Kostas > > > > * Not unlike VCs other than the fact that the 'presentation'-layer is the > verifiable container itself. > > ** The solution can apply to any file that supports custom metadata. > > > > -- > > Konstantinos A. Karasavvas > > Software Architect, Blockchain Engineer, Researcher, Educator > > https://twitter.com/kkarasavvas > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fkkarasavvas&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093963991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rZyucVKx%2FjqWxcKZZyU6F%2FrAHP0UpYyf7NdloVZs8p4%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > > -- > > Konstantinos A. Karasavvas > > Software Architect, Blockchain Engineer, Researcher, Educator > > https://twitter.com/kkarasavvas > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fkkarasavvas&data=04%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C5c0d311ec8564d3ab9b808d87592ab9e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637388620093963991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rZyucVKx%2FjqWxcKZZyU6F%2FrAHP0UpYyf7NdloVZs8p4%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > -- > > Konstantinos A. Karasavvas > > Software Architect, Blockchain Engineer, Researcher, Educator > > https://twitter.com/kkarasavvas >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2020 18:57:14 UTC