Re: ditch voip/sip

Thank you so much Balázs. When we've discussed this in the past, we had a
few concerns around switching (which I've managed to block out), but the
big factor that stands out is cost. DIF's support would be a tremendous
help.

I think all of our other concerns would be addressed by doing zoom + irc
(for queueing/minutes). As a bonus, zoom recordings are way easier than
what we do now (which is the reason some recordings are still
to-be-backfilled).

Chairs: we'll need to make sure we're not forgetting anything; let's
discuss.


On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:03 AM Kostas Karasavvas <kkarasavvas@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:29 AM MXS Insights <mxsinsights@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Michael Shea
>>
>> > On May 26, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Nikos Fotiou <fotiou@aueb.gr> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > I would like to bring up again the voip/sip issue. At least in my case
>> it is impossible to connect using sip and I always end up dialing in using
>> skype. I am wondering why sip is still the used method, especially given
>> that ZOOM is used for other calls, even in the same group (e.g.,
>> did-resolution). I read in the mailing list archives that one of the
>> reasons is audio recording, but AFAICT the audio recordings from most of
>> the last meetings are missing (e.g.,
>> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2020-05-19/audio.ogg
>> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2020-04-21/audio.ogg
>> https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2020-04-07/audio.ogg and many others)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Nikos
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Konstantinos A. Karasavvas
> Software Architect, Blockchain Engineer, Researcher, Educator
> http://kkarasavvas.com/
>

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 17:10:59 UTC