- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 21:20:40 -0400
- To: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 5/1/20 5:54 PM, Orie Steele wrote: > To date, we've not seen any revocation systems that don't require DLT, > it's my understanding that this one could be adopted to support DLT but > does not require it. That is correct. It is possible to use this scheme with a DLT, or IPFS, or other decentralized storage system, but it is not a requirement. > I can't promise a second implementation (nor would it be helpful in > javascript, which is my strongest language), but I can help develop the > spec, add tests, and demos, assuming it is supported in the other > javascript ecosystem components, like vc-js. Great, thank you, Orie! We have a second sponsoring company and editor. I'll start the W3C CCG work item request process in Github now. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Saturday, 2 May 2020 01:20:56 UTC