- From: Heather Vescent <heathervescent@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:32:27 -0700
- To: steve.e.magennis@gmail.com
- Cc: Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+C6qMzQKfkcKQ+dg2eq-rm43pKK6p9nbAEKC1NUoAr0cip5rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Moses, Yes, people are looking into verifying data associated with the supply chain. That was one thing we explored in this DHS funded report, Sensors, Identifiers & Digital Twins: https://bit.ly/GSCreport. You should check it out. I wrote about the broader impact here: https://medium.com/in-present-tense/can-supply-chain-transparency-save-the-world-15d7e8d5c11b It's not just limited to (high) fashion, it has an impact on other supply chains, which influences economics, and global trash. There are also some major issues - like jurisdiction specific laws. The pharma supply chain is the most advanced using this technology due to regulatory compliance. Also, all this enables Industry 4.0 - which is a very Elon Muskish manufacturing future driven out of Europe. FWIW, Patagonia is the brand/manufacturing leader in this space. H&M and other European brands are following. Sustainability is an important value for younger generations. And the Covid crisis is having a major impact on fast fashion -- in a good way. Fast fashion is very destructive to the environment. It's good to be done with it. This is a topic we discuss over at the Hyperledger Supply Chain SIG. This is one reason I am so keen on digital identity technology for non-humans and preparing this data for ML tools. We are so in the early stages of this rn. There are a lot of people/companies already exploring these ideas in specific verticals and more broadly across the supply chain. Cheers, -Heather On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 7:25 AM <steve.e.magennis@gmail.com> wrote: > In my mind, supply chain provenance suffers from two key problems: > enticing participants to take on the extra effort required to participate > in the system, and ensuring the suppliers are honest in using the system. > The first issue can be addressed with contractual or legal requirements. I > imagine there might be a few businesses or industry segments out there that > see a strategic advantage to being part of a verifiable supply chain and > seek out systems to participate in, but mostly I would think this is > something that would be imposed upon them and not without direct or > indirect compensation. The second problem is more challenging. If a > supplier has integrity and a good reputation then their mark stands for > something. On the other hand if a supplier’s operation has not risen to > that level, then external audits, or certifications by some organization > that has a sterling reputation must be invoked. For the lux goods example, > this might mean industry standards organizations but might also have to be > the brand itself, meaning they might need to be responsible for ensuring > the integrity of the entire chain (think Starbucks coffee provenance > system). Do trusted governance ecosystems ensuring material and > manufacturing quality need to exist at each stage of the supply chain > before a brand can promote provenance in a meaningful way, even before VC’s > come into play? Can / should a brand take on some of the missing pieces? If > the assembly factory is awesome but the tannery that supplies the leather > is less so, is that still OK as far as the brand is concerned? > > > > From the brand and consumer perspective there is clear and direct > value-add. Bootstrapping and sustaining the other participants is more of a > challenge. > > > > Others in this group have thought about supply chain much more deeply than > I have and I’d be interested in differing perspectives. > > > > -S > > > > *From:* Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2020 10:59 PM > *To:* W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: 3M Validation Page > > > > Wayne Chang's post : > > On 6/10/20 4:30 PM, Wayne Chang wrote: > > This page lets you to "pull" credentials based on 3M identifiers printed on the product packaging: https://safeguard.3m.com/Guest#/Validation - I think it's an interesting exhibit as we explore the right roles for VCs across e-commerce and battling counterfeit goods. > > ... got me thinking. > > The luxury fashion brand Alyx is piloting a blockchain using QR codes to > display where materials were sourced, where manufacturing took place and > where the product was shipped to. And the luxury brand conglomerate LVMH > has partnered with ConsenSys and Microsoft to create the traceability > platform called AURA where details of a particular item can be checked to > confirm its authenticity, confirming whether the item is genuine. This > allows them to combat grey goods, and can theoretically assure ethical and > sustainable manufacture. > > Still I'm tired of thinking about COVID, I'm taking a break to daydream -- > and wondering if vreifiable credentials could be used in the fashion > industry? > > So I have some questions... > > > > 1) Because the cost of transaction is relatively high, AURA is likely to > remain the preserve of high-end luxury goods, where anti-counterfeiting is > the primary use case. So this leads me to wonder... would a VC be cheaper > than writing a record a blockchain? > > > > 2) If these brands wish to create a more intimate connection the consumer, > it might be smarter to do something like this: Imagine Beyonce's Ivy Park > activewear line included a VC. Why? Because Beyonce has been attacked over > social media for using Sri Lankan factories paying 2¢/hr for labor. A chain > of VCs could theoretically verify a chain of ethical manufacture, and also > ensure compliance with sustainability goals. Plus, that VC provides a one > time pass to receive a free song, that is not available commercially. Would > anyone be up to helping me think this through as a gedanken exercise to > understand VCs better? > > > > Anyway, something like this feels interesting to me, because it isn't the > same old Alice/Bob in a supply chain example. Has anyone put thought into > this sort of thing already? > > > > Moses > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Moses Ma | Managing Partner* > > moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com | moses@futurelab.ventures | > moses@ngenven.com > > v+1.415.568.1068 | skype mosesma | *linktr.ee/moses.tao* > <http://linktr.ee/moses.tao> > > FutureLab provides strategy, ideation and technology for breakthrough > innovation and third generation blockchains. > > Learn more at *www.futurelabconsulting.com* > <http://futurelabconsulting.com>. For calendar invites, please cc: > mosesma@gmail.com > > > > Or whet your appetite by reading *Agile Innovation* > <http://www.amazon.com/Agile-Innovation-Revolutionary-Accelerate-Engagement/dp/B00SSRSZ9A> > | *Quantum Design Sprint* > <https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Design-Sprint-Application-Disruptive/dp/1799143864> > | my blog at *psychologytoday.com* > <http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation>. > > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT > OF THE TRANSMISSION. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, > DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY > PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN > E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THIS EMAIL SHOULD > NOT BE CONSIDERED BINDING; HARD COPY DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO CREATE > LEGALLY BINDING COMMITMENTS. FOR CALENDAR INVITES, PLEASE CC: > MOSESMA@GMAIL.COM > -- Heather Vescent <http://www.heathervescent.com/> President, The Purple Tornado, Inc <https://thepurpletornado.com/> Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity <https://ssiscoop.com/> Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual <http://amzn.to/2i2Jz5K> @heathervescent <https://twitter.com/heathervescent> | Film Futures <https://vimeo.com/heathervescent> | Medium <https://medium.com/@heathervescent/> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/> | Future of Security Updates <https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/>
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 15:32:54 UTC