- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:24:46 -0500
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 1/20/20 3:12 PM, David Chadwick wrote: >> The HTTP Message Signatures specification standardizes how you >> digitally sign the content of HTTP Messages. Any authentication or >> authorization protocol will depend on this specification > > This is a rather broad statement and is not factually correct. Yes, you are correct. I think I was in the middle of writing one sentence and then finished writing another sentence and the resulting sentence made no sense. :P What I meant to say was: "Any authentication or authorization protocol that depends on signing HTTP headers or content will benefit from this specification (examples include (DID Auth HTTP Binding, Authorization Capabilities for EDVs, DIDComm HTTP Binding)." ... and yes, we could walk back "will benefit" to "may benefit from". :) -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Monday, 20 January 2020 20:24:53 UTC