W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > December 2020

Re: Verifiable Requests?

From: Liam McCarty <liam@unumid.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 18:16:51 -0600
Message-Id: <6096F00B-4990-4B5B-A3AA-681CE145BD43@unumid.org>
Cc: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>, Bjorn Hamel <bjorn.hamel@workday.com>, Keith Kowal <keith.kowal@workday.com>, Kamal Thandapani <kamal.thandapani@workday.com>
To: Gabe Cohen <gabe.cohen@workday.com>
Fully support this! We’ve been using our own version of verifiable requests from the beginning because there’s really no choice for many use cases. (Or rather, there’s no choice but to have some notion of requests — and may as well make them verifiable.)


Liam McCarty
Co-Founder of Unum ID <http://www.unumid.org/>

> On Dec 18, 2020, at 6:08 PM, Gabe Cohen <gabe.cohen@workday.com> wrote:
> Hi CCG folks,
> We at Workday are working on wrapping Presentation Exchange <https://identity.foundation/presentation-exchange/>  requests and notice there is a gap in the VC-Data-Model. There is a section on Verifiable Presentations <https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/#presentations>, but not Verifiable Requests.
> What about adding pretty much the same language as VPs, but for VRs — wrapping a request for credentials with some metadata and a proof?
> Happy to collaborate on getting this added.
> Gabe 

Received on Saturday, 19 December 2020 00:17:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 19 December 2020 00:17:22 UTC