W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > December 2020

Re: JWS Clear Text JSON Signature Option (JWS/CT)

From: Gabe Cohen <gabe.cohen@workday.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:44:31 +0000
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BYAPR06MB4167F7EFC731AE688C8F6ADA88F30@BYAPR06MB4167.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
One should choose to the non-LD version when the complexity of LD is not worth any of its features, or your business doesnít necessitate the use of the features it offers.

I hope we can all think of some cases where robust semantic support is not necessary.

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 at 1:51 PM
To: public-credentials@w3.org <public-credentials@w3.org>
Subject: Re: JWS Clear Text JSON Signature Option (JWS/CT)
On 12/2/20 2:27 PM, Gabe Cohen wrote:
>   * you are absolutely not guaranteed to digitally
>     sign the information in the message... just the bytes
> This is exactly why we created that signature suite. LD isnít always
> wanted or necessary. Sometimes just signing the bytes is what you want
> and need.

When should a developer choose one mechanism over the other?

-- manu

Manu Sporny - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_manusporny_&d=DwID-g&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=8q0wrOfH-XtkquJe3zZvbZIZ4Fdjh_ScTjE6H3xw59k&m=pYEZKW1BAx2pk4HQ0_93RrO-b0xD9p-x2akUSAsqEj0&s=Qj66V2YD_2v1_n4K23vGVArH1Cjfe4qh0JyWKiSduI0&e=
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 23:44:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 2 December 2020 23:44:56 UTC