- From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 06:56:07 +1200
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
hi Daniel On 11/04/2020 03:42, Daniel Hardman wrote: > Let's quit treating DIDComm as an irrelevancy. As I understand DIDComm (from your presentation) this is a peer to peer protocol between two equals. This does not conform to the VC model since two equals never talk to each other. We have issuer-holder communications and holder-verifier communications. The roles are different, so we might expect the protocol to be asymmetric, rather than symmetric as DIDComm appears to be. If this is the case, then DIDComm would be irrelevant to the VC protocols. Kind regards David
Received on Friday, 10 April 2020 18:56:28 UTC