- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:06:11 +0000
- To: D.W.Chadwick <info@verifiablecredentials.info>, Anil Lewis <anillewi@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
David - in that model, does that mean that you ignore all contexts that you don't have "pre-configured"? Are they at least properly stored and forwarded, as required? Leonard On 4/2/20, 4:38 AM, "D.W.Chadwick" <info@verifiablecredentials.info> wrote: Hi Anil I can assure you that JSON-LD processing is not needed in order to implement a VC eco-system. JSON processing is all that is needed, along with pre-configured @context definitions Kind regards David On 01/04/2020 07:51, Anil Lewis wrote: > Team, > Verifiable credentials are based on JSON-LD and after reading > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmanu.sporny.org%2Fcategory%2Fjson-ld%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Cdc259566d2b14a5c14aa08d7d6e131ec%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637214135021849674&sdata=e22S%2FryitHj7LLeyBtJvCYhaZKwYWLGOgwmM0wH95fo%3D&reserved=0 , I am a bit concerned about > performance. Has anyone used vc.js and associated libraries in scale > in some pilots? I understand the recommendation from the article is to > cache the contexts but have pilots that have used this strategy with > substantial number of learners see any issues with json-ld processing? > Note that I am referring to the examples provided in > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c-ccg%2Fvc-examples&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7Cdc259566d2b14a5c14aa08d7d6e131ec%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637214135021849674&sdata=kiUDtI6U9XsBBmAPlNAtMf1kNB79Ax8fG18iGZT41ts%3D&reserved=0 > > .
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2020 14:06:27 UTC