Wrt to the Music Biz Mind Map, unfortunately, that’s all I have at the moment.
From: Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin <snorre@diwala.io>
Sent: September 20, 2019 4:13 AM
To: Michael Herman (Parallelspace) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
Cc: daniel.hardman@evernym.com; sethi shivam <sethishivam27@gmail.com>; W3C Credentials CG (Public List) <public-credentials@w3.org>; W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List) <public-digital-verification@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding Revocation of Keys
Do you have a less pixelated picture of that music biz mind map? It is very difficult to read the text inside the dots.[https://app.prosperworks.com/tp/t/NzMzNDc5fHx8fHwyNTU0NTJ8fHx8fDE1Njg5NzQzNDc0MTg=/space.gif?creator=snorre@diwala.io]
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Michael Herman (Parallelspace) <mwherman@parallelspace.net<mailto:mwherman@parallelspace.net>> wrote:
Reinforcing Daniel’s point, every corporation isn’t going to “have a DID”. A typical corporation is going to have billions and billions of DIDs across hundreds or thousands of DID Method Spaces …it’s simple. …it’s real life. …and the Real Subjects (and Personas and Digital Subjects and Credentials) associated with these DIDs are going to be created, read, combined into new Subjects, bought, sold, exchanged, and/or given away millions of times a day …possibly every hour.
For example, here’s a DID Network representing the life and lifecycle of a singer/songwriter/musician/performer: …millions of (Universal) DIDs from tens, possibly hundreds, of DID method spaces.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D56F8C.26DFBF80]
Here’s what the draft Universal Digital Identifier (UDID) Taxonomy looks like…
[cid:image002.jpg@01D56F8C.26DFBF80]
Best regards,
Michael Herman
Self-Sovereign Blockchain Architect
Hyperonomy Digital Identity Lab
Parallelspace Corporation
[Trusted Digital Web Certificate 0.1]
From: Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com<mailto:daniel.hardman@evernym.com>>
Sent: September 19, 2019 12:18 PM
To: sethi shivam <sethishivam27@gmail.com<mailto:sethishivam27@gmail.com>>
Cc: W3C Credentials CG (Public List) <public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>>; W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List) <public-digital-verification@w3.org<mailto:public-digital-verification@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Regarding Revocation of Keys
So i assume. If in case we are handling a corporate id. All we can do is we can transfer the control?
Am i right?
A corporation can have a DID, and if the corporation gets sold, or if its officers change, then there is probably NOT a new DID; rather, the controllers/authentication/authorization/keys for the existing DID are updated.
And second case
Yes lets consider the case of iot device. Lets say i sold my phone to my friend or some other iot device. Say self driving car.
How will did and keys get handled.
See my answer to this on your other thread.
--
[https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1rrnSCfL0eQbwK0dS3CE6XFtdHO8NDHMq&export=download]
Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin
Co-Founder & CTO, Diwala
+47 411 611 <tel:+47%20404%2061%20926> 94
www.diwala.io<http://www.diwala.io/>
