Re: Regarding Changing ownership

Thank you for the clarification.

Thnks alot

On Thu, 19 Sep, 2019, 11:44 PM Daniel Hardman, <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>
wrote:

> Suppose Party A is the controller of Thing X, identified by X.did.
>
> Inside of X.diddoc is A.pubkey.
>
> Now A sells X to B.
>
> B gives A B.pubkey.
>
> A writes an update to X.diddoc that replaces A.pubkey with B.pubkey, and
> signs the update with A.pubkey.
>
> Now X.diddoc contains B.pubkey. No private key has been shared, but
> control has been transferred.
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:11 PM sethi shivam <sethishivam27@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Michael,
>> For the explanation.
>> I am still struggling with the transfers of keys in case of changing the
>> controller
>>
>> What are the ways to do that.
>>
>> Because we can't share the private key with others.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Sep, 2019, 11:19 PM Michael Herman (Parallelspace), <
>> mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:
>>
>>> A DID can be assigned to any non-fungible entity (aka a unique,
>>> non-interchangeable thing).   For example, the Sovrin Governance Framework
>>> supports this through the Controller concept; more specifically,  a Thing
>>> Controller.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Controller An Identity Owner that is responsible for control of another
>>> Entity—specifically the Private Keys needed to take actions on behalf of
>>> that Entity. For example, a Thing Controller has a Controller relationship
>>> with a Thing. It is one of three types of identity control relationships
>>> described in Appendix C.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Michael Herman
>>>
>>> Self-Sovereign Blockchain Architect
>>>
>>> Hyperonomy Digital Identity Lab
>>>
>>> Parallelspace Corporation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* williamc@itr8.com <williamc@itr8.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill
>>> Claxton, Founder & Operations Director of NextID
>>> *Sent:* September 19, 2019 5:29 AM
>>> *To:* sethishivam27@gmail.com
>>> *Cc:* public-credentials@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Regarding Changing ownership
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sethi,
>>>
>>> Technically I suppose a DID may be assigned to a laptop, but you made me
>>> go back and read the spec.  "In a decentralized identity system,
>>> entities (in the sense of discrete identifiable units such as — but not
>>> limited to — people, organizations, and things) are free to use any shared
>>> root of trust."  To me it seems weird that a laptop can be a DID subject,
>>> as it is not free to do anything much less share a root of trust.
>>>
>>> I don't believe DIDs are intended to capture ownership information.
>>>
>>> Regards, Bill Claxton (williamc@nextid.com)
>>> LinkedIn, Facebook, Telegram, Slack, Skype, Twitter or Gmail: wmclaxton
>>> SG Voice, Text or Whatsapp: +65-9012-4327
>>> US Voice, Text or Voicemail: +1-415-797-7348
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/19/2019 6:45 PM, sethi shivam wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a query. Suppose I have a laptop with DID "did:laptp:12345"  and
>>> I sold it to someone. Now ownership changed to my friend.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>