Re: Building a bigger tent for DIDs - Are you using a 5-star DID Method?

• From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
• Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 11:52:29 -0700
• To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <097734ce-03af-9d86-97fc-7d318ab67dc2@sunshine.net>

On 2019-03-31 11:20 am, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Can we instead focus on providing very specific and concrete changes to
> the suggested specification text?

OK, I've had my say, and thanks for the considered response.

Concrete changes:

In the Abstract you presented, I believe an "of" is missing in:
"DIDs that are managed through the use Distributed Ledger Technologies";

which I think should be:
"DIDs that are managed through the use [of] Distributed Ledger 
Technologies".

And in your original email, I believe "Editor's" was used twice to 
indicate a plural; which is not correct. "Editors" is the plural.

Both nitpicky, but apparently that's what you want this time. ;-)

Steven

Received on Sunday, 31 March 2019 18:53:03 UTC