- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:48:38 -0500
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 3/7/19 12:09 PM, Daniel Burnett wrote: > The recommendation is that the CCG establish and maintain these > registries. Having done some thinking on this on the plane ride home from Barcelona... We might be able to put all of these items in a single "Verifiable Credentials XYZ Registry" that the CCG maintains. Where XYZ could be something like "Extensions", "Methods", or something else that's encompassing of status methods, evidence methods, credential schema types, terms of service descriptions, etc. It would be just one place that people could go to see all of the things you can plug into the Verifiable Credentials data model (instead of having to jump between a ton of different registries to get a holistic picture of the VC extension points). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Friday, 8 March 2019 16:49:01 UTC