Michael, That's great, thanks as always for your input and suggestions! Yes let's continue where we left off last time around technical use cases of "resolution" and "resolvers". I think it was important that you reminded us of the need to be precise there. Note: We said we'd do the DID Resolution call on a bi-weekly basis, i.e. again next week Thursday, not this week. We can of course decide to change that if we think we want to move faster. all the best, Markus On 2/27/19 7:20 PM, Michael Herman (Parallelspace) wrote: > > Markus, on tomorrow’s (or is it next week’s?) DID Resolution call, can > we continue from where we left off last week with a discussion DID > resolution technical use cases? > > > > I’ve created a proposed list of technical use cases here: > https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-resolution/issues/32 > > > > I’m recommending this so that we have a better sense of where we’re > headed in terms of the end goals/needs/requirements for the current > discussion (vs. being led step-by-step towards an unspecified set of > goals). > > > > Best regards, > > Michael Herman (Toronto/Calgary/Seattle) > > Independent Blockchain Developer > > Hyperonomy Business Blockchain / Parallelspace Corporation > > > > W: http://hyperonomy.com <http://hyperonomy.com/> > > C: +1 416 524-7702 > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2019 10:30:49 UTC