Hi Jeffrey, It's still not too late to support the creation of the DID Working Group. Check https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Aug/0000.html for more information. If your organization is a W3C member, please consider giving your support. And even if you're not, you can still share this link with others to raise awareness. --Andrei On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:21 PM Brent Zundel <brent.zundel@evernym.com> wrote: > The next step toward the DID spec becoming an official W3C recommendation > is the creation of a DID working group. > The charter for a W3C DID working group is under review by the W3C right > now. We will find out soon if the working group has been approved. > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 09:15 Jeffrey Neijenhuis <jeffrey@dragonchain.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am reading your extensive report on DID's, from a few days ago. Very >> much enjoy it, and all the effort that went in to that with all the authors >> is amazing, thank you for publishing that. I have a question, and hope you >> could clarify for me. The document says the following: >> >> '' It is not a W3C Standard nor is it on the W3C Standards Track''. >> >> I could not find it, is there an official standard for DID at the moment? >> Thank you so much for your time. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jeffrey Neijenhuis >> jeffrey@dragonchain.com <zara@dragonchain.com> >> >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 10:00:46 UTC