- From: Daniel Thompson-Yvetot <drthompsonsmagickindustries@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:31:59 +0200
- To: Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com>
- Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>, Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@evernym.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAF_jFptKXmw2E-1BTgnFTBv79vWB7vgVsFrKtGV2VUZhXHjTAA@mail.gmail.com>
I actually stopped reading Daniel's message when he said *Hyperledger* and *Normative -* sorry about that. I think my reaction was mostly because I am interested in the purity and utility of the spec, the elegance and readability of the language and less so about third-party RFCs and Spec Applications. Only after reading Christoper's and Joe's responses did I go back and reread it all. I am relatively new to this particular group, and it is challenging for me to know which persons, companies or identities that "we" refers to. I totally get Christopher's point about communities, and I also know firsthand how easy it is to slip into the "we" persona. Now, while it could be argued (I won't) that drawing lines in the sand about which words we use for the things we are talking about is territorialist at best and preemptive marketing at worst, something that I keep coming back to is that there is an intriguing dichotomy here: 1. We need words for concepts to help us envision things that don't yet exist 2. These words don't change the intrinsic nature of imaginary things, because they are at best the map, not the territory (which can't yet exist, obviously). As unfortunate as Daniel's phrasing might seem to some, I think that the bigger picture here is that we're (as in the people in this email thread) are talking about pattern discovery, and I would actually up the Ante on Joe's metaphor: We are a bunch of cooks in the same kitchen and we all speak different languages and have our own techniques. Whether you call it Salz, Salt or Sel - it's the same chemistry. I have actually had the privilege of working in multilingual kitchens with some amazing sous chefs, and I know that a knife is sharp, a fire is hot, skittles hold stuff. When I sprinkle baking soda on onions in skittle simmering in a splash of lemon juice - it is really magical, no matter which language you use to describe it or how you plan to serve it. In fact, I don't even need to use words to show you. Just basic principles need understanding, and by mere observation the process can be repeated - or applied to shredded red cabbage or anything that needs extremely rapid tenderization. And from what I understand, this is why JSON-LD was originally built: to Link Data from different schemas so that naming conventions just need to be mapped and are interoperable. NEVERTHELESS, we do need methods to commune about what we investigating, and to this end words and diagrams are helpful. But I would really caution about making them too canonical too soon, because this kind of linguistic imperialism can really sour the curd. ;) Have a great Wednesday everybody, Daniel Thompson-Yvetot
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2019 08:32:58 UTC