- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:42:18 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 4/24/19 10:50 AM, Karyl Fowler wrote: > Most corporate early adopters of DIDs we have worked with are trying > to address process inefficiencies in their businesses that cause > them to assume undue liability that eats into their margins or slows > things down unbearably (like in the refugee case); they are already > investing in optimizing their operations, so part of implementing a > more portable, privacy-first identity solution includes helping > clients evolve their business processes in tandem. We want to set > them up for success, and the right process /is/ that foundation. Just wanted to underscore what Karyl is saying here... I think she's right on point. Specifically, if Verifiable Credentials (or DIDs) are issued via a shaky process, it will increase the rate at which damage can be done. A lot of this stuff depends on really good process engineering wrt. the production of Verifiable Credentials (and management of DIDs). -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2019 14:42:42 UTC