Re: A simpler approach to DID services and content-addressing

Please forgive me if this question triggers remedial tutoring.

Is there some important reason why we can't repurpose an existing
convention? For example, could we just adopt the familiar syntax for query
strings?

did:example:1234abcd?a=b&c=d&e=f

This has the advantage that every software stack on the planet probably
already has code that can parse it, and every developer already knows it.