(resending CC'ing all as I didn't in first iteration of this) On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:39 AM Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > There is yet another alternative based on "pure JSON": > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-erdtman-jose-cleartext-jws-01 > > It seems to address the issues below. > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:39 PM Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-10-04 03:27, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote: > There is yet another alternative based on "pure JSON": > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-erdtman-jose-cleartext-jws-01 > > It seems to address the issues below. The challenge is that this draft is completely dependent on the canonicalization scheme, which is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-01 What I’ve heard repeatedly is that this canonicalization scheme doesn’t address some number of other requirements, including supporting graph data models. I too would like to understand more precisely what these other requirements are so I can effectively articulate them. -- Christopher Allen
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2018 07:26:46 UTC