W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > May 2018

Re: Fwd: Registration request: did URI scheme

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:33:29 -0400
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, uri-review@ietf.org
Cc: Graham Klyne <gklyne@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9e5d4e01-6b79-7390-fa61-5efd47f28303@digitalbazaar.com>
On 05/14/2018 11:05 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> I think the issue might be titled something like: "Allow DID 
> documents to be retrieved using any URI scheme".

Ok, I understand the point you're making now. I've created a new issue
to track this here:


... and will track the discussion there.

> Rather, a generally preferred approach is to dereference the URI and
>  examine the content-type of what is returned.

What happens if the protocol you're using to resolve the identifier
doesn't provide a content-type in return? We have a couple of DID
Resolvers that might never return content-types (Bitcoin and Ethereum
come to mind). I guess we could require that all Resolvers return
content-types... but given the absence of a content-type, the front part
of the URI "did" provides all the information you need to process the

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
Received on Monday, 14 May 2018 15:33:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:27 UTC