Re: Different Approaches to Ethereum Identity Standards

Hi Manu,
Thanks for pointing this out

I've updated the article

Pelle

On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> Post by uPort folks on DIDs, VCs, etc:
>
> https://medium.com/uport/different-approaches-to-
> ethereum-identity-standards-a09488347c87
>
> Pelle, a couple of corrections to your post:
>
> "Implementation of the DID (Decentralized IDentifier) standard from the
> Decentralized Identity Foundation"
>
> The CCG is responsible for the DID spec, not DIF. DIF doesn't work on
> standards. DIDs are not a standard yet, we're not even in an official WG.
>
> Also, I note that the CCG nor RWoT is mentioned anywhere in the article
> even though significant amounts of the work you are calling out in that
> document have been incubated and are primarily being pushed forward in
> those two communities.
>
> Would you mind updating the article to address these issues?
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The State of W3C Web Payments in 2017
> http://manu.sporny.org/2017/w3c-web-payments/
>
>


-- 
*Pelle Brændgaard // uPort Engineering Lead*
pelle.braendgaard@consensys.net
49 Bogart St, Suite 22, Brooklyn NY 11206
Web <https://consensys.net/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConsenSys> |
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/consensussystems> | Linkedin
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/consensus-systems-consensys-> | Newsletter
<http://consensys.us11.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=947c9b18fc27e0b00fc2ad055&id=257df01285&utm_content=buffer1ce12&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer>