W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > September 2017

Re: HTML Metadata and Decentralized Identifiers

From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 00:51:58 +0000
To: "dlongley@digitalbazaar.com" <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DM5PR01MB3275C29070B037751B9200E0C57F0@DM5PR01MB3275.prod.exchangelabs.com>
For those interested in these topics, verifiable claims, schema.org and embedded JSON-LD:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/verifiable-news/journalistic-html-metadata.html#verifiable-claims-schemaorg-and-embedded-json-ld



Best regards,
Adam

From: Adam Sobieski<mailto:adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎September‎ ‎29‎, ‎2017 ‎12‎:‎13‎ ‎PM
To: dlongley@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Timothy Holborn<mailto:timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>

I’m interested in how verifiable claims, decentralized identifiers and schema.org schemas interoperate in embedded JSON-LD for scholarly, scientific and journalistic scenarios. Thanks for any sketches or examples.


Best regards,
Adam

From: dlongley@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎September‎ ‎28‎, ‎2017 ‎11‎:‎04‎ ‎AM
To: Timothy Holborn<mailto:timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org<mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>

On 09/28/2017 10:28 AM, Timothy Holborn wrote:
> WIP: https://github.com/insideout10/wordlift-plugin/issues/591
>
> consideration i'm still thinking about is about the merit of perhaps
> schema.org/claim <http://schema.org/claim>

-1 to schema.org/claim (or schema.org/credential and any other items in
the VC data model for that matter) ... we're targeting using 'claim' in
the Verifiable Claims work and would prefer not to have a term clash
with the schema.org @context as we see them being used together.

>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 at 23:41 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com
> <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 09/26/2017 03:28 PM, Adam Sobieski wrote:
>      > <html>
>      >   <head>
>      >     <meta name="model:author"
>      > content="did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21" />
>      >   </head>
>      >   <body>
>      >     …journalistic content…
>      >   </body>
>      > </html>
>
>     Before this conversation goes too far down this road, Adam, are you
>     aware of schema.org <http://schema.org>, RDFa, and embedded JSON-LD?
>     If not, you will want
>     to look into it as folks have already been working on this problem for
>     10+ years and have stuff deployed that the search engines are indexing
>     today (see the examples):
>
>     http://schema.org/CreativeWork

>
>     The only thing that's missing is a DID and a digital signature on the
>     content, which we'll be able to provide in a compatible way via the
>     Verifiable Claims work.
>
>     -- manu
>
>     --
>     Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>     Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>     blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
>     http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/

>


--
Dave Longley
CTO
Digital Bazaar, Inc.
http://digitalbazaar.com


Received on Saturday, 30 September 2017 00:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:13 UTC