- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:03:27 -0400
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
On 09/28/2017 10:28 AM, Timothy Holborn wrote: > WIP: https://github.com/insideout10/wordlift-plugin/issues/591 > > consideration i'm still thinking about is about the merit of perhaps > schema.org/claim <http://schema.org/claim> -1 to schema.org/claim (or schema.org/credential and any other items in the VC data model for that matter) ... we're targeting using 'claim' in the Verifiable Claims work and would prefer not to have a term clash with the schema.org @context as we see them being used together. > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 at 23:41 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com > <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: > > On 09/26/2017 03:28 PM, Adam Sobieski wrote: > > <html> > > <head> > > <meta name="model:author" > > content="did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21" /> > > </head> > > <body> > > …journalistic content… > > </body> > > </html> > > Before this conversation goes too far down this road, Adam, are you > aware of schema.org <http://schema.org>, RDFa, and embedded JSON-LD? > If not, you will want > to look into it as folks have already been working on this problem for > 10+ years and have stuff deployed that the search engines are indexing > today (see the examples): > > http://schema.org/CreativeWork > > The only thing that's missing is a DID and a digital signature on the > content, which we'll be able to provide in a compatible way via the > Verifiable Claims work. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built > http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ > -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc. http://digitalbazaar.com
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2017 15:03:52 UTC