- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:27:10 -0700
- To: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@blockstream.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Verifiable WG (Public List)" <public-vc-wg@w3.org>
On 2017-09-23 12:56 AM, Christopher Allen wrote: > * DID (Decentralized Identifier) Primer > <https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-fall2017/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/did-primer.md> > As always, we encourage comments & suggestions... Thank you for the DID Primer, which I found very enlightening. One question/suggestion. You use "DID document" throughout with a lower-case on the word "document". If my understanding is correct, there is only one "DID document", for each unique DID, at least for a given DID method. Is this correct? If so, perhaps using "DID Document" would follow the capitalization norms better -- when a specific instance of something is cited, in English, then it's capitalized. I bring this up because IMO this capitalization would go a long way towards helping with a problem that potentially may come up in future, when generic "documents" of all kinds begin to be published/accessed using the DID system. Steven
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2017 20:26:49 UTC