Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the last discussion between Manu and Drummond concluded to just use the Credentials CG mailing list for the DID Spec and put the specs as CG work items. Susan Bradford +1-801-376-5464 https://www.evernym.com/ On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 00:43 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > >> On 10/19/2017 07:28 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> > There is also a block chain CG which may like to discuss energy usage >> > of the block chain and consensus mechanisms. >> >> The W3C Blockchain CG has shut down and is inactive, AFAIK. >> > > Did you consider starting a DID CG? > > I think they're likely sufficiently different to WebIDs, and i think > they're sufficiently different from Verifiable Claims that in-turn require > identifiers (URIs ideally?). > > noting also: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/ > 2017Jul/0005.html > > >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built >> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ >> >>
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 15:06:36 UTC