Re: Credentials CG charter vote result

Hi Manu / Kim,

the charter link text[1] appears to have changed substantively, whilst the
authorship date (and in-effect, post) appears to be the same?

it also appears some of these changes have been recent?

I feel like i've missed alot; and i'm wondering what happened with the
tasks outlined in the original charter.  Are the new WIP pipelines
maintaining, retaining or supportive of the original scope or works?

IMHO also; i think the original charter should be reverted to the version
used to pass it; and a new post should be established for the new charter,
under this same group.

Tim.H.

[1]
https://web.archive.org/web/20150718154445/https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/charter/


On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 at 09:11 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The votes for the Credentials Community Group charter were tallied on
> Friday showing unanimous support for the charter among the people that
> voted. Voter turnout was 36% for this charter vote. As a point of
> comparison, W3C Advisory Committee votes for new charters for official
> working groups always garner less than 10% voter turnout.
>
> Votes in favor of the charter:
>
> Manu Sporny
> Mark Leuba
> Pindar Wong
> Bill Gebert
> AnonymousVoterA (this person identified themselves to Manu)
> Badge Alliance
> Timothy Holborn
> Mary Bold
> Bailey Reutzel
>
> As a result of this vote, I have added a sentence at the top of the
> charter noting when it was ratified by this community group:
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/credentials/charter/
>
> Tim, now that we have a charter, you could propose your changes as a
> change set on top of the currently ratified charter.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
>