- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:31:37 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok1y3JcUN+8wJ2NRGiBU31MOmvd+op_8XvS-MEkcnFcMYw@mail.gmail.com>
also, What's the DIFF with http://docs.oasis-open.org/xdi/xdi-core/v1.0/csd01/xdi-core-v1.0-csd01.xml ?? On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 21:19 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > I've changed the subjectLine. > > opinions outlined below. > > The WikiPedia links should be for the version referenced by the doc. > > ie: > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Federated_identity&oldid=800443727 > vs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federated_identity > > key-value pair > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribute%25E2%2580%2593value_pair> = bad > link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribute%25E2%2580%2593value_pair > > re: > > 1. URN is the term for a specific type of URI intended to persistently > identify a resource, i.e., an identifier that will never change no matter > how often the resource moves, changes names, changes owners, etc. URNs are > intended to last forever. > > I looked up both https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urn and > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Name noting the > differences herein. i later found https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2141.txt > which should likely be hyperlinked to title. > > there's otherwise a bunch of broken links. please check them all. > > this spec. looks like... > > well. I hope the work from the group is documented in a modular way. > Something about being able to use parts of the work, without having to eat > it all... > > Tim. > > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 20:59 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Found a relevent IETF RFC[4] re: trust anchors[2] >> >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 18:09 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> very quickly. was looking at the overview[1] and saw the concept "root >>> of trust <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor>" which hyperlinks >>> to Trust Anchor[2]. I suggest either defining a new wikipedia page for the >>> term[3] rather than simply a redirect, or change the term used in the spec >>> doc. >>> >>> more l8r. >>> >>> Tim.H. >>> >>> [1] https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/#overview >>> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_anchor >>> [3] >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Root_of_Trust&action=history >>> >> [4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5914 >> >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 17:49 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 08:20 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/18/2017 01:50 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote: >>>>> > Manu -- what are your thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Steven, at this point the only feedback we're looking for is only >>>>> technical in nature and even then, based on whether the text reflects >>>>> consensus at Rebooting the Web of Trust 5, which you weren't at. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this a RWOT spec? >>>> >>>> If so, it should be marked as such. This CG can then make one >>>> inspired by it, if/as required. >>>> >>>> Therein, the spec should be moved to the RWOT repo? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> In other words, the spec isn't ready for your kind of valuable feedback >>>>> yet... it would largely be a waste of your time to correct the large >>>>> swaths of the spec text that may be confusing for non-implementers that >>>>> are buried in the details right now. >>>>> >>>>> I expect that we may need your review help in a few months time from >>>>> now. As always, thanks for offering and we will certainly take you up >>>>> on >>>>> it once it becomes a good use of your time. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'll review and have a look; and am not sure of the specifics, whilst >>>> noting important principles herein. >>>> >>>> IMHO: it's important to be inclusive and the W3 IPR framework is not >>>> unintentionally misaligned in some way that is against the spirit of this >>>> structure. >>>> >>>> I guess. try not to oversimplify imho. might end-up with unintended >>>> consequences. (technically speaking). >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- manu >>>>> >>>>> best wishes, >>>> >>>> tim. >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>>>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>>>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>>>> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built >>>>> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ >>>>> >>>>>
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 10:32:16 UTC