- From: Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:18:17 +0000
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAB=TY865oVyT29aPgfYtS4dCZ4d+FuV8GwqPeYzUUJhBHttyrA@mail.gmail.com>
I am for keeping owner. I think the only concerns raised on the BTCR side were repetition (in owner and id values -- which is possibly more pronounced in BTCR). However, I understand the concerns in removing it. I'd rather be explicit and keep it. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:55 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > Standards don't care about philosophy, AFAIK. School of hard knocks n > all. IMHO therefore, better to ensure modalities are flexible / inclusive. > > On Tue., 17 Oct. 2017, 7:50 am Melvin Carvalho, <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 16 October 2017 at 21:52, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/16/2017 10:58 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> > Why would that want to be removed? >>> >>> There were a few folks from the Bitcoin BTCR DID camp that asserted that >>> you can assume who the key owner is if the key is listed in the DID >>> Document, which I believe is true (without putting much thought into it). >>> >>> The downside, of course, is that not listing the key owner is >>> incompatible with all the Linked Data Signature libraries. There are >>> systems, such as HTTP URL-based ones, where you MUST provide the owner >>> (to create the bi-directional link between the site that the key is >>> published on and the site that hosts the triples for the owner of the >>> key). A compromise would be to inject the owner before sending the key >>> into the LDS libs, or to just be okay with a common format across all >>> DID Documents. >>> >>> I suggested that the BTCR folks don't break from this pattern as it'll >>> make BTCR-specific implementations more difficult with the only upside >>> being the saving of a few tens of bytes of data. >>> >> >> If I've understood correctly. There's possibly another advantage of >> making it explicit, in that you can index the web of reputation more easily >> without having to hard code assumptions into the indexer. >> >> This may lead to a nice searchable trust graph and search engine eco >> system that grows over time. >> >> >>> >>> -- manu >>> >>> -- >>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built >>> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ >>> >> -- Kim Hamilton Duffy CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139 kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu 425-652-0150 | LearningMachine.com
Received on Monday, 16 October 2017 23:18:51 UTC