- From: Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:58:18 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAB=TY84_09H4wOVXuonUT0ybYUZ2_XgtT4Ur3JZ5f70Sm-e61g@mail.gmail.com>
Building on Manu's point about proposals, I think we'd be most productive dividing the changes into themes/categories, each of which would be elaborated on in a proposal. Some I identified: - service descriptions - serialization formats - key descriptions - tightening up timestamp semantics Several of these require advance work: e.g. we need to identify use cases for service descriptions, we need input about IPID for serialization formats, ... so I think some advance preparation would make these meetings (and our communication around them) more effective. I would gladly lead (or co-lead) the key descriptions part. Thanks, Kim On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 11/15/2017 11:41 AM, Susan Bradford wrote: > > The agenda for each call will be set by the editors and will be > > limited to discussion of the open issues in the order of priority the > > editors have determined based on feedback from contributors. > > A few of us in the US won't be able to make it due to the Thanksgiving > holiday. If we could provide an Agenda to the group, we can get > preliminary feedback on issues for those that won't be able to attend. > > To put it another way, if we could get PROPOSALS for changes to the spec > in advance of the meeting next week, Drummond could get an idea of where > there is consensus and where there isn't. One of the issues w/ having > meetings around holidays is that if people don't show up, and you make a > decision, the decision is almost immediately undone when you find out > that the people that weren't there disagreed with the decision. > > The other way to do that is to make decisions based on consensus of > attendees preliminary pending a 7-14 day waiting period to see if there > are objections to the decisions. All decisions would be published to the > mailing list for broader feedback and when it's clear that there are no > objections (after 7-14 days) do you ratify the decision. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The State of W3C Web Payments in 2017 > http://manu.sporny.org/2017/w3c-web-payments/ > > -- Kim Hamilton Duffy CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139 kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu 425-652-0150 | LearningMachine.com
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:58:54 UTC