- From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 23:13:34 +0100
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
Hi Manu can I suggest that you change and simplify the wording of the poll as follows Role D verifies that Role C is either the Role A of the Claim or is entitled to represent the Role A of the Claims. Role C is typically the Role A of Claims. In some circumstances, where the Role C is not the Role A of the Claim, then the Role C must be able to prove that he/she is authorized to provide the Claims. To Role D verifies that Role C is either the Role A of the Claim or able to prove that he/she is authorized to provide the Claims. I think the compact version is clearer and more precise regards David On 26/06/2017 17:27, Manu Sporny wrote: > I have updated the terminology playground with the latest options (be > sure to shift-reload): > > https://vcwg-terminology-playground.firebaseapp.com/ > > The poll has also been updated with the latest options: > > https://www.opavote.com/en/vote/5724357032673280?p=1 > > Important changes: > > * An additional role has been added for "Subject". This is an attempt > to address Steven Rowat, Dave Longley, and David Chadwick (among > others') concerns around split roles (Subject/Presenter). > > * The number of options for ROLE_C has become so large that it will > most likely lead to bad polling results. I suggest that we start > aggressively culling the ROLE_C list before the vote starts > tomorrow. We should get some strong arguments against roles that you > feel should not be in the running. > > As a reminder, this is how we suggested that the poll is conducted last > week (with added detail): > > 1. We finalize the poll during the VCWG call tomorrow. For ROLE_C, > we will hopefully remove options that at least 25% of folks don't > think are in their personal top 5 list. > 2. The poll will run for seven days and close 5pm ET July 4th. > 3. Anyone that has educated themselves on the options should vote. If > you haven't been following at least one of: the issues, mailing list > discussion, or the calls, please don't vote. For example, please > don't circulate the poll to your work colleagues that don't > participate in the WG or CG and ask them to vote. > 4. If you vote, you are asked to vote in an individual capacity and not > on behalf of your organization. We want terminology that is both > correct and that will immediately resonate with readers. > > -- manu >
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 22:14:13 UTC