Re: RFCs in RDF

Did the logic make any sense?

I also saw: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3870.txt. Whilst exploring the
concept.

Underlying theory is,

I've been contemplating the potential role of what's been recommended to be
a SIG to deal with some of the more ISOC related subjects; some of which
I'd expect to be ontology.

Exploring ideas about how W3C, IEEE, ISOC might all start to bring together
an effective Cooperative towards this and other

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_-_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf
related stuff.

My quite old note is:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2014Jul/0043.html

Therein some examples of how ISOC work might bring value to a broader
project that requires works done in an array of areas cooperatively.

Tim.h.

On Wed., 14 Jun. 2017, 5:44 am Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor), <
rse@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> On 6/13/17 12:34 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote:
> >
> > (Off topic) question: has anyone ever considered publishing RFC's in
> > RDF?  (I.e. both txt & RDF)
> >
> *coming out of lurking mode*
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> The RFC Editor has no plans for publishing RFCs in RDF. We do have
> extensive plans, however, to start publishing TXT, HTML, and PDF/A-3
> (each transformed from a base XML). I would have liked to have added
> EPUB to the list, but couldn't get anyone to write the necessary
> detailed requirements doc for it. The new RFC format will allow
> non-ASCII characters and black-and-white SVG art. Crazy times. :-)
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rse/format-faq/
>
> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/FormatToolsPlan
>
>
>
> -Heather Flanagan
>
> RFC Series Editor
>
>
>