Going over old ground (was: Re: Agenda for January 10 VCTF meeting)

I've updated GitHub with issues pertaining to the use-cases i can find (i
remember we made a rather extensive list, but i can't find the doc anymore)
and in-doing so, was reminded of the conversations relating to the days
when we were establishing the group;
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2014Aug/0005.html

which in-turn pertained to a broader conversation:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2014Aug/

I personally found that interesting, particularly as the things i started
working on then, are what i've continued to work on through to this day.

If i find more use-cases that seem to have been misplaced, i'll post them
in github as suggested.

Tim.H.

On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 at 17:40 Joe Andrieu <joe@andrieu.net> wrote:

> Tim,
>
> The use cases we'll be discussing are at
> https://opencreds.github.io/vc-use-cases/
>
> Please suggest improvements or ask questions via the issues list at
> https://github.com/opencreds/vc-use-cases/issues
>
> I'll have some proposals for additions/improvements to the Needs Map and
> there are already twenty issues to consider, ranging from simple grammar to
> terminology shifts and additional content.
>
> The more we can discuss via github issues, the easier it will be to
> address your concerns about time on the call.
>
> -j
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, at 02:32 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote:
>
> Maybe also basic math skills tutorial?
>
> The allotted time (perusal) is 1 hour, and someone is leading the schedule
> into a format that seems to imply use of some unknown compression format.
>
> We use standards here I thought?  Time being one of them.
>
> Best wishes for 2017.  I suggest if the agenda items do not fit into the
> allotted time (ie 1 hour schedule with specified tasks and allotted time)
> its disingenuous to list it. (To a running sheet that says you need 1:50).
>
> Unless some sort of other statement is implied, that is less clear?
>
> If people believe they'll be running the broader agenda, with an array of
> "lockout modalities", I expect a graph / ontological response is amongst
> the most likely  outcomes. (If, like the compression algorithm used in your
> proposed agenda that does not make sense, let me know.  Happy to outline
> it.).
>
> Finally, please supply the modern usecases being reviewed.  They've been
> stripped in past, simplified, and I believe the dignity/privacy related
> considerations less than clear as part of former text redactions. It's
> important people know what their voting for.
>
> Tim.h.
>
> On Sat., 7 Jan. 2017, 8:21 am Varn, Richard J, <rvarn@ets.org> wrote:
>
> Tuesday, January 10, 2017
>
> Time: 11am ET, UTC -5
>
> Text Chat: http://tinyurl.com/w3c-vctf
>
>            irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#vctf
>
> Voice: sip:vctf@96.89.14.196
>
>        tel:+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306 <+1-540-961-4469;ext=6306> (extension
> 6306)
>
> Duration: 60 minutes
>
> Scribes: DanB, NateO, KerriL, MatthewL, CarlaC, StuartS, MattS, GreggK,
> ShaneM, Longley, ChristopherA, Manu, DavidE, LesC, RichardV, BrianS,
>
>
>
> Proposed Agenda
>
> ---------------
>
> 0. Agenda review and Introductions (5 mins)
>
> 1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is open - Vote! (5 mins)
>
> 2. Use Case Review (50 mins)
>
> ----The Line---- (if time permits after the above)
>
> 3. Use of WebIDL in spec [1] (20 min target)
>
> 4. Privacy Section Discussion [2] (10 min intro)
>
> 5. Part II of the GitHub tutorial (20 mins)
>
>
>
> [1]https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues/4
>
> [2] https://github.com/opencreds/vc-data-model/issues
>
>
>
> Please let us know if there are any other items to consider at the next
> meeting or subsequent meetings.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>
>
> --
> Joe Andrieu, PMP
> joe@andrieu.net
> +1(805)705-8651 <+1%20805-705-8651>
> http://blog.joeandrieu.com
>
>