W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > December 2017

Re: Kim: meta question about these mailing lists (was: Re: Proposal for Credentials CG to maintain registries for DID Methods, Linked Data Key Types, and Credential Status Method)

From: =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:46:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAjunnZyYmaxum_zKj779yRSpWKW6MFOEPWK2A9frmX3z7d2wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>
Cc: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>
Kim, thanks for the explanation. So I'll just direct my emails to
the Credentials Community Group from this point out (unless replying to an
email to both, like this one).

=Drummond

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <
kim@learningmachine.com> wrote:

>
> Drummond -- the Digital Verification group is the informal task force for
> signature suites. However, nothing happens on that mailing list
> specifically right now (all conversation has moved to Credentials CG). I
> usually copy that group in case there is someone on that list not on the
> CCG list, but it's in all likelihood not needed right now.
>
> We'd like to reserve it for future use, as it might make sense for focused
> discussion of signature suites.
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:10 AM =Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@evernym.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Kim, a second question for you: what's the difference between the two
>> different lists that this email is going to? I want to make sure I'm
>> sending the right messages to the right lists.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> =Drummond
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <
>> kim@learningmachine.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In last Tuesday's Credentials CG call, we put out proposals for the
>>> Credentials CG to adopt a registry creation/update process for 3 specific
>>> registries*.
>>>
>>> To summarize, there are two proposals on the table.
>>>
>>> PROPOSAL 1: Adopt the registry creation and update process for the
>>>             Credentials Community Group.
>>>
>>> PROPOSAL 2: Adopt the Credentials CG as the registry maintainer for
>>>             the DID Methods, Linked Data Key Types, and Credential
>>>             Status Method Registries.
>>>
>>> Complete details are in Manu's email to the group (Details: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2017Dec/0020.html)
>>>
>>> Please let us know by tomorrow's calls if you have any objections to these proposals.
>>>
>>> ** note: this is 3 as opposed to 2, as accidentally stated in the call*
>>>
>>> -- Kim Duffy, on behalf of Credentials CG chairs
>>>
>> --
>>> Kim Hamilton Duffy
>>> CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
>>> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
>>> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=732,+Cambridge,+MA+02139&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>
>>> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
>>> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com
>>>
>> --
> Kim Hamilton Duffy
> CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139
>
> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:46:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:17 UTC