W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > August 2017

Re: Schemas or Models of Credentials and Issuers

From: <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:51:38 -0700
To: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>, Public-Credentials <public-credentials@w3.org>, Rutu Mulkar <me@rutumulkar.com>
Message-ID: <3d4701b2-6c12-4a54-9916-50e420c6cde6@Moses-Mas-iPhone>
  
  

 FYI, Rutu and I are working on "deep learning based auto-generation of ontology" as applied to verifiable claims, and will present about this subject at RWOT.   
  

  
We are also working around issues dealing with    the IP for such functionality. Maybe I should talk to Kim about this.
  

  
Moses
  

  

  
  
 --
  

Moses Ma | NextGEN Ventures Inc

  

moses@ngenven.com (mailto:moses@ngenven.com)   |moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com (mailto:moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com)

    

v   +1.415.952.7888 (tel:(415)%20952-7888)   |   m+1.415.568.1068 (tel:(415)%20568-1068)   |   skype   mosesma

  

blog  &  social media:   my blog at psychologytoday.com (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation)   |   linkedin (http://www.linkedin.com/in/mosesma)   |   facebook (http://www.facebook.com/moses.t.ma)   |   twitter (http://twitter.com/mosesma)

  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Aug 29, 2017 at 8:15 PM,  <Adam Sobieski (mailto:adamsobieski@hotmail.com)>  wrote:
>   
>   
>           
>   
> David,
>   
>
>   
> Thanks. I agree that we will need extensible ontology. These ontology and digital   wallet querying topics are interesting to me.
>   
>
>   
> Also, the capability for websites to version their   account verification processes, in particular as issuers emerge,   users perhaps verifying their accounts more than once, is an important topic. Such versioning would include versioning the digital wallet queries which could adjust the credentials available for use in the user interfaces of digital wallets for users to compose verifiable profiles from.
>   
>
>   
>
>   
> Best regards,
>   
> Adam
>   
>
>   
>   
>   From:   David Chadwick (mailto:D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk)
>   Sent:   ‎Tuesday‎, ‎August‎ ‎29‎, ‎2017 ‎5‎:‎16‎ ‎AM
>   To:   public-credentials@w3.org (mailto:public-credentials@w3.org)     
>
>   
>   
> Hi Adam
>   
>  I envisage that an ontology will be needed, and that the CCG could
>  define a generic global ontology (cf X.500/LDAP) whilst communities of
>  users will define their own application specific ones to supplement the
>  global one
>   
>  regards
>   
>  David
>   
>  On 29/08/2017 09:28, Adam Sobieski wrote:
>   >  Credentials Community Group,
>   >
>   >  In a decentralized identity model,   various issuers can provide
>   >  identifying credentials (nations, states, cities, universities, banks,
>   >  companies, etc.).
>   >
>   >  While querying digital wallets is still a pioneer topic and a work in
>   >  progress, we can envision that a verifiable profile is composed by a
>   >  user, utilizing a set of credentials, in response to a query or request.
>   >  We can envision that a set of attributes may be requested, each
>   >  attribute may be optional or required for a request, and, for each
>   >  attribute, data and metadata about pertinent credentials and issuers may
>   >  be specified or described, defining acceptable credentials per attribute.
>   >
>   >  Topical is describing credentials’ and issuers’ data and metadata   so
>   >  that a verifier can   ensure that a verifiable profile is composed from a
>   >  set of acceptable credentials. I would like to ask about schemas or
>   >  models of credentials and issuers.
>   >
>   >
>   >  Best regards,
>   >  Adam Sobieski
>   >
>   
>              
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2017 20:52:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:24:45 UTC