W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Expiry time in Data Model

From: Stone, Matt <matt.stone@pearson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:09:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+w1=RTEuv87Sr+rbEKeJFQHvxY-dLLMjDcYTA-NWPbZntBQmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com>
Cc: Nate Otto <ottonomy@gmail.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Certainly optional for the issuer to populate it, but if populated it has
to have teeth, so the receiving system would respect it as if a directive
 -- pretty soon we're going to be expressing the "verification states" of a
claim (unverified, valid & current, was valid)


=====
Matt Stone
501-291-1599


On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Eric Korb <eric.korb@accreditrust.com>
wrote:

>
> I agree with Nate that expiry is not part of the claim, but rather an
> implementation detail.  I don't think it should mandatory, but rather it
> could be an optional property that we could define as part of the
> DigitalCredential specification.
>
> Eric
>
>
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 22:09:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:29 UTC