- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:23:58 +0000
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2m5vENRNi23AN7Wr8mPUugxR62VNxT=-FKKwiwM9h4zw@mail.gmail.com>
'Late year' = last year + bot inference. Would be good if we had two seperate creds for that usecase too... On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 at 2:21 AM, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > 2:18am so, not the best time... > > These were developed mid late year. I can develop more if you like, yet > the purpose of these ingredient lists, if you like, is to show the array of > use-cases and how the combined 'package' of creds, which may have an array > of different views or perspectives from / by different actors, inter-relate > through the use of linked-data, bonding otherwise inter-connected, but not > siloed, groups of instances together as to form a coherent set of effects > otherwise not considered achievable. > > > Mind, as noted. If we're going to build a global silo, then I think that's > worth noting now. > > Timh. > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 at 2:16 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for your detailed use cases. I will review them carefully. As to >> your comment about credentials not being obvious in the scenarios... I >> will take a spin through, but I feel like we were very careful to show in >> each scenario where a verifiable claim / credential would be used. >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Timothy Holborn < >> timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here's a bunch of old sophisticated use-cases i prepared earlier ;) >>> >>> I haven't noted the use of credentials throughout the user-stories, yet >>> they should be able to be discovered / addressed by the trained eye. >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> USECASE: Watching a Cooking Show >>> Person searches for the particular meal they want to make that night for >>> a dinner party. They search for ‘slow-cooked lamb shoulder’, and find a >>> jamie oliver episode provided by a commercial FTA provider. >>> >>> They’ve got a list of the food they’ve purchased recently from their >>> digital receipt information. The program has a TVC that outlines the >>> end-product created by the food, and it's decided - time to go shopping. >>> >>> A button is pressed, and the information about ingredients is selected. >>> The application has a field that asks who’s coming for dinner - the user >>> selects the people coming for dinner, and their dietary requirements are >>> checked for allergies and any food preferences (ie: don’t like mushrooms, >>> kosha food only, etc.). >>> >>> The app calculates portion sizes based upon the number of people who >>> will be eating, and the shopping list is almost ready. They’re able to tick >>> off the food that’s already in the kitchen, then add the remaining >>> ingredients. >>> >>> A file is created on the user's data-space that includes information >>> about the application they used to create the meal, and a credential >>> relating to the agent who supplied that application and on behalf of whom. >>> >>> OPTION 1 >>> jamie and his distribution partners have a deal with a particular >>> shopping network, so if it’s kosha, that’s ok, but otherwise there’s >>> preferences about where to get it >>> >>> Jamie also has another deal, that’s not as good, with other outlets. >>> >>> ie: The user opens their ‘supermarket app’, and makes the selection. the >>> app also thinks the milk has gone off, and the user can select other things >>> they need which may have been collated over time (ie: toilet paper low, ran >>> out of dish-washing detergent, etc.) They can get the ingredients delivered >>> or go shopping. >>> >>> OPTION 2 >>> The recipe is Jamie's Intellectual property. He cares about his food. >>> When the user goes to a store that offer digital receipt functionality to >>> data-spaces, if that purchase relates specifically to the production of the >>> meal, fulfilment of ingredients to make it, the shop has in their system an >>> attribution method that allows a percentage of valid food products to goto >>> jamie. >>> >>> Ingredients have been purchased and the user can watch the TV or flick >>> through the cooking guide whilst preparing the dish. This can happen on >>> their device, on their tv, with both, etc. >>> >>> The ‘interactive content package’ enables this entire experience to be >>> programmed, packaged and distributed globally. differentiators between >>> markets / regions, can be managed by agents, distributors and local >>> partners without needing to change the format of the content package. >>> >>> USE CASE: Buying a Motor Vehicle >>> >>> Joe wants to purchase a new vehicle. He really wants a 2004 XC90, >>> thinking that it suits his needs and represents good value. He wants to >>> watch a review, searches for one - finds an old TVC made in britain, made >>> available locally through the a local program that’s been syndicated by a >>> commercial broadcaster who has purchased the media as part of their >>> on-demand offerings. >>> >>> The presentation page has a presales button, which the user selects on >>> his phone. He can see how many were sold in the market, average cost of >>> insurance, average KM’s, average price based on condition and how many are >>> available for sale. He watches the video and plans to go have a look at a >>> few. >>> >>> He finds a dealer who is offering a vehicle he likes and speaks to their >>> sales agent Frank. Joe asks the Frank to Take the Vehicle for a Test-Drive. >>> >>> Frank would like to know whether Joe has the capacity to purchase the >>> vehicle or whether, Joe's simply interested in going for a test-drive with >>> no-capacity to make a transaction. Frank has a family and it's important he >>> spends his time on sales opportunities. Frank does not have alot of time to >>> waste on 'tyre kickers'. >>> >>> Joe has a look at the information about the car on his phone that his >>> obtained when he found the vehicle. >>> >>> The car has been in the lot for too long, and Frank thinks this is a >>> ‘hot lead’ but wants to qualify the opportunity. He asks to share some more >>> details and if the information provided stacks up, then joe should borrow >>> the car. >>> >>> Joe presses a button on his phone, and Frank gets a 'green light' >>> indicator that shows that joe has a license and has the financial capacity >>> to purchase the car. >>> >>> -- > Whilst it is none of Franks business; Joe has a linked-credential >>> that denotes the intention of his parents to purchase a vehicle for him to >>> a particular value, which in-turn contributed towards getting the 'green >>> light' he needed, before going to find a car he likes. >>> >>> Frank is happy to provide Joe access to the car, to take for a >>> test-drive. Frank and Joe issues credentials for the purpose of the >>> test-drive, that support insuring the Joe in case he has an accident; >>> whilst also supporting Frank, in case Joe doesn't come back with the car. >>> >>> Joe takes the car for a test-drive and notices that there are some >>> mechanical issues with the car. He enters the information in his record >>> that relates to the vehicle, and the application on his phone provides an >>> estimation of the cost to fix the problem in addition to any information >>> about whether by law, Frank needs to fix that problem before he sells it to >>> Joe. >>> >>> Joe Returns. Frank and Joe talk about the price, which results in Frank >>> finishing the sales-opportunity by issuing Joe an Offer that is attached to >>> the record stored in relation to his phone application. Joe informs frank >>> he'll be back, frank limits the offer to a few days hoping to close a deal >>> before the time his commissions need to be finalized for the month; Joe >>> goes to have a look at other vehicles. >>> >>> If the sale goes through, then the lead was generated by the program on >>> TV and the experience provided by that program. It is possible that they’re >>> then able to ‘clip the ticket’, which may result in an improvement around >>> their advertising on TV, a direct cash-payment, or other means. >>> >>> USE CASE: Community Media, Education, and Content Syndication. >>> >>> Within an indigenous ‘outback’ community, the local radio station has >>> set-up their hypermedia capability. Their website offers an array of local >>> media, that is available for syndication with local community TV providers >>> and other news-outlets. Their system works by taking a percentage of the >>> revenue attributed to the content they curate with local community members. >>> >>> They've got a shed they've turned into a historical society, storing >>> valued historical artefacts that are important to their community. People >>> in the community have memories of life, and stories that relate to those >>> artefacts. >>> >>> The radio station provides the opportunity members of the community to >>> produce a content package about the heritage artifacts. They work with >>> elders in the community, producing some video where elders tell their >>> stories with historical context. They create a 3d scan of the object, and >>> also write both some information about it that is collated into their >>> heritage collection, in addition to some articles that are used for their >>> local radio broadcast and their local news website. >>> >>> Some of those materials become syndicated for by other broadcasters >>> nationally. >>> >>> Advertising and syndication revenue provides a percentage of revenue >>> back to the creators of the work, and the local radio station who helped >>> produce it, ensuring it was suitable and accurate. >>> >>> The people who contributed to it, are provided credentialing information >>> that also shows they've learnt the skills involved in undertaking the task. >>> This contributes to their employment and educational / skills records. >>> >>> People involved with running the station and their online environments >>> accumulate information about their activities. This information can be used >>> by local businesses to assess whether they can find the local talent needed >>> to help them with their business. The business wants to produce some >>> advertising materials. They've managed to find the skills locally, and the >>> local radio station is able to syndicate the media for use across the >>> network, helping the business target their advertising and ensure it is >>> ‘ready for TV’... >>> >>> NOTES >>> In this use-case, the practice of community media provides both the >>> capacity to identify and process local media, as well as supporting >>> community development and community engagement. NANODEGREES[6]: >>> Nano-degrees are emerging in the marketplace as a means to provide >>> 'qualification' for particular skills that may be constituents of broader >>> formal qualifications. These systems store ‘metadata’ about the user in the >>> users account. As such, these systems in-turn provide the means for users >>> to understand and communicate their skills, talents and interests using >>> data, that improves the means in which they may find employment. >>> >>> Tim.H. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 10:17 Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: >>> >>>> I assume there is a VCTF meeting tomorrow. My action was to update the >>>> use cases document into the new IG VCTF space in preparation for a tight >>>> coupling between it and the draft verifiable claims charter. The charter >>>> has not yet made it into this space - I know that Manu has been moving >>>> house AND been ill, so I imagine he is just a tad behind. But the draft >>>> use-cases are up at http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/ >>>> >>>> Please have a look in anticipation of discussing these tomorrow and >>>> over the coming week. >>>> >>>> Caveat: I did this work with little consultation from my fellow >>>> editors. That's completely my fault, and they all have my permission to >>>> publicly berate me for it. Or better yet, make edits or submit pull >>>> requests. >>>> >>>> P.S. There has been a lot of discussion of additional use cases on the >>>> community group mailing list. I love those discussions - let's keep them >>>> going! This document is necessarily limited as the subset that will >>>> support the initial work we want to do as a working group AND designed to >>>> not overwhelm the reader. So if you don't see your favorite scenario or >>>> requirement, it will be in the supporting "extended use cases" document in >>>> CG space. If you feel strongly that it should be exposed in this limited >>>> space, or that tweaking one scenario will get it covered now, please let me >>>> know! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Shane McCarron >>>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -Shane >> >
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:24:37 UTC