- From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:03:43 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 6/21/2016 7:10 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 06/20/2016 09:07 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: >> I think I understand why the simplest form of the architecture >> diagram is appropriate for this set of slides. > > Yes, we believe that most AC Reps want to see a general architecture > diagram, but don't want to be bothered with the details (as it's the job > of the Working Group to make sure to get that right). +1 >> The only point I'm a bit curious about is the reason for excluding >> the more-detailed version of the architecture from one of the >> referenced 'detail' documents? ... > The details are important for building the system, but they are > marginally useful for someone that is trying to decide if they should > vote to start the work at W3C or not. That last paragraph is a nice gem that should be engraved in any tutorial materials for folk trying to get a standards effort started... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 20:04:36 UTC