- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:37:25 -0400
- To: Brian Sletten <brian.sletten@gmail.com>
- Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 06/15/2016 09:05 PM, Brian Sletten wrote: > Overall things look pretty strong. Yaay. > How do we want to track edits? GitHub issues? Here? Submit pull > requests? PRs are easiest. > One of the Use Cases is called “Uniquitous Claim Issuance”. I am > assuming we are not going for the unique/ubiquitous play on words > and that is just a typo. Typo, that I thought we fixed some time ago. > Are the JWT examples in the data model valid? They lack the header. > A JWT is a header.claims.signature(header.claims), no? No. In fact the JWT examples look wrong, but haven't had a chance to figure out how wrong. They're definitely not Linked Data Signatures compatible. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 01:37:53 UTC