W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: Almost there: Verifiable Claims Working Group Proposal

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:37:25 -0400
To: Brian Sletten <brian.sletten@gmail.com>
Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Message-ID: <576202D5.101@digitalbazaar.com>
On 06/15/2016 09:05 PM, Brian Sletten wrote:
> Overall things look pretty strong.


> How do we want to track edits? GitHub issues? Here? Submit pull 
> requests?

PRs are easiest.

> One of the Use Cases is called “Uniquitous Claim Issuance”. I am 
> assuming we are not going for the unique/ubiquitous play on words
> and that is just a typo.

Typo, that I thought we fixed some time ago.

> Are the JWT examples in the data model valid? They lack the header.
> A JWT is a header.claims.signature(header.claims), no?

No. In fact the JWT examples look wrong, but haven't had a chance to
figure out how wrong. They're definitely not Linked Data Signatures

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2016 01:37:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:53 UTC